[lbo-talk] Endgame in the banking sector

[Eubulides]

boddi satva wrote:
> Frankly, I find your argument incomprehensible. The FIRST thing Poole says
> in the article YOU cite is that intervention during crisis is wrong.
>
> If Poole is not laisez-faire in your book, your book really doesn't matter.
>
>   
===============

Well you are the master of unreading.

So why hasn't Poole resigned in protest?

Perhaps you might want to check up on the myths of laissez faire.