That's why Hillary might have been a better candidate than Obama.
HLM himself was not much better, however, at weighing policy issues
than the voters he disparages.
>
>
>
>
> And then, as a sig:
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> "When a candidate for public office faces the voters he does not face
> men of sense; he faces a mob of men whose chief distinguishing mark is
> the fact that they are quite incapable of weighing ideas, or even of
> comprehending any save the most elemental — men whose whole thinking
> is done in terms of emotion, and whose dominant emotion is dread of
> what they cannot understand. So confronted, the candidate must either
> bark with the pack or be lost. [...] All the odds are on the man who
> is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can
> most adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum.
> The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men." - HL Mencken
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> .............
>
>
> Hilarious!
>
> I love how Woj's sig is orders of magnitude longer than the actual
> content of his post.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> .d.
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>