> On Sep 19, 2008, at 10:42 AM, sawicky at verizon.net wrote:
>
> > I remember that passage, being struck by its insight.
> >
> > That's why Hillary might have been a better candidate than Obama.
>
> Eh? Hillary is devious and awful in many ways, but she's hardly
> mediocre and her mind is hardly vacant.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I see no virtues in her. She's a lousy executive, she's not a policy
>
> expert, her moral sensibility is deficient. She's a crafty politician
>
> whose booster rocket was her marriage to a rake.
>
> That's all I see. We're a long way from helping the Childrens'
>
> Defense Fund.
>