I don't see how the judge cannot award Churchill backpay and reinstatement. Isn't
a principle of remedy in civil cases "make whole"--to put the agrieved party back to where they
would have been but for the actions of the other party? And if it is true that
"A court of equity is a court of conscience, and whatever, therefore, is unconscionable is odious in its sight," then surely the judge has to do the right thing.
Michael Yates