>
>
> The "outside" of Derrida or Foucault (most specifically Derrida, of whom I
> have much more knowledge than I have of Foucault, and it is possible I may
> be reading the former to some extent into the latter) is the point at
> which the system breaks down or contradicts itself. It is a feature of the
> structure itself. It is not a real "outside," like, say, a Kantian
> noumenon is outside.
>
>
> --- On Mon, 4/13/09, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] internally riven
>> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>> Date: Monday, April 13, 2009, 6:47 PM
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Eric Beck wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Chris Doss <lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> You're not getting it Miles. My objection is not
>> to the notion that there are social structures that
>> >operate independently of any individual (duh). My
>> objection is to the notion that there is ONE >structure,
>> with nothing outside it,
>> >
>> > If you think Foucault wasn't concerned with outsides,
>> you really do
>> > need to stop typing and read the guy.
>>
>> But that would complicate things enormously! Strongly
>> worded opinions might have to be revised. Best stick with
>> the straw man.
>>
>> Doug
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>