On Apr 24, 2009, at 11:36 PM, Joseph Catron wrote:
> Aside from being unnecessarily (and unimpressively) insulting, are
> you really going to force me, in order to prove my point, to compose
> a list
> of the unambiguous atrocities that are perfectly compatible with
> bourgeois
> law? What would be the point of that?
Because forcing you to do that would be an atrocity that is perfectly compatible with bourgeois law? Irony, eh?