Well, if it seems unremarkable, that's because the truth often is mundane.
And when it comes down to it, haven't bourgeois apologists been accusing socialists of being tyrants - and from a bourgeois perspective it makes sense: anyone who wants to replace the impersonal laws of the free market with a democratically planned allocation of society's resources must seem like a 'tyrant' to those for whom any challenge to capitalism is an affront.
It is good to see the Hayek-based philosophy of Beck and 'SA' uncovered.
Who is SA, anyway?
Shamelessly Apolitical Socialist Agnostic Substandard Argument Stubbornly Antagonistic Silly Arse Sulking Angrily Still Arguing? Shit 'Appens Soviet Apparatchik