>
> On Apr 30, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
>
> But I can only ignore him or call him a slimeball if on this list he
>> relates to me (or to any other poster) as a journalist to a subject.
>>
>
> I've been doing this for more than a decade and you can say something this
> ridiculous? Fuck off.
>
Good lord... "Kendy, Gail, Hugh, Carli, whicheveryouare" (which is what my grandmother would yell at her kid/s).... go to your rooms, both of you... Isn't it just possible that pretty much everyone on the list is sometimes acting like a journalist, sometimes like a moralist, sometimes like an expert, sometimes like a conversationalist, sometimes like a neophyte, sometimes like a sniper (or snorker) and sometimes like someone a bit unsure about what exactly they're up to or what a particular thread is "really" about at the moment? Do we each really have to have a single stance, style and strategy?