> Here is the sad thing: People make non-peer-reviewed arguments every
> day. Non-fiction that is not peer reviewed has been known to end up on
> the best-seller list and influence public debate. In falsely claiming
> valid peer review, Pierpont has undermined the credibility of her
> arguments far more than non-peer reviewed publication would have.
> Valid arguments do not need to be shored up by carefully planned
> deceit.
I'm sure her work *was* peer reviewed by her fellow petro-employees.
-- In Solidarity, Billy O'Connor