[lbo-talk] bada bing bada-badiou (was: Review of Badiou's Number and Numbers)

Jeffrey Fisher jeff.jfisher at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 12:07:30 PDT 2009


i do admit i am disappointed that there is no real reckoning with whitehead or james/dewey in what i've seen. whitehead can't even be excluded on the grounds that he is insufficiently mathematical.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jeffrey Fisher <jeff.jfisher at gmail.com>wrote:


> lol
>
> nice
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Eric Beck <ersatzdog at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:24 PM, shag carpet bomb<shag at cleandraws.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > and then i'm left wondering why the entire history of american
>> metaphysics
>> > was just left out: santayana, james, dewey, whitehead, justus buchler.
>>
>> Those people are way too empirical for Badiou.
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>
>
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list