I'm out!! (brain clearly not at level needed for internet communication ;)
On 8/16/09, HMFJ <hardwin1 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> (I mean, last sentence without "both" in it - originally said "both the
> image and the words" ;)
>
> On 8/16/09, HMFJ <hardwin1 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Joe -
>>
>> The nights (?) of the army
>> Little Diouf came from Ougadougou with his comrades, the children of the
>> troops of the A.O.F. (French Occidental Africa), to open the fantastic
>> spectacle the French Army presented at the Palais des Sports this week.
>>
>> So one could surmise both the words would also have stuck in Foucault's
>> craw!
>>
>>
>> On 8/16/09, // ravi <ravi at platosbeard.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 15, 2009, at 5:54 PM, "Jordan Hayes" <jmhayes at j-o-r-d-a-n.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ravi writes:
>>>>
>>>> My problem with terms like "real time web" is that they
>>>>>> are marketing jargon or denote opinion trends and don't
>>>>>> really demarcate anything
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> But you have to admit, it's much better than the old batch-mode-web we
>>>> used to have. I still have some of those punch cards.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah man do you remember HTTP 1.0 when you sent in a request via RS232
>>> escape sequences and then waited for your upstream UUCP guy to batch down
>>> you web pages every alternate day? That used to suck! And then Marc
>>> Andreesen and Sir Berners-Lee and Ashton Kutcher wrote up RFC54757 -- "real
>>> time extensions to TCP keep-alives to make HTTP less sucky" ... Or was it my
>>> old acquaintance Schulzrinne with RTP... All I know is I can't go back to
>>> living batch mode... I WON'T!!!
>>>
>>> -- ravi
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes that's right; I name-dropped Henning. How sad is that? ;-) Should I
>>> have gone with Al Aho?
>>>
>>>
>>> ___________________________________
>>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>>
>>
>>
>