The reason I am refusing to switch is that I am pretty sure that in a few years the assholes in Redmond will pull the same trick again - as they have in the past - so it is not worth my effort to learn a skill that will almost certainly become purposely obsolete in the near future. Thus far I am staying with Office 2003 which is practically as good as the 2007 and will be good for a few years and then will see what my options are. I am very much inclined to move away from Microsoft products to avoid jumping though the planned obsolescence hoops these assholes create, and I hope that alternatives will improve by that time, so I can switch without losing any functionality.
Wojtek
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Wojtek S wrote:
>
> So, really, what makes otherwise cost-conscious people and businesses,
>> especially outside the US, fork over good money to Redmond for their
>> overpriced and poorly debugged crap?
>>
>
> Though I'm using a 2000 version of Office for the Mac - the latest version
> is full of improvements that suck - I think it's pretty terrific. Word and
> Excel are tremendously useful and work well. I didn't pay all that much for
> it either. From what I've seen of Windows, it sucks. But no complaints about
> Office from me.
>
> Doug
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>