[lbo-talk] Was Megrahi really guilty?

ken hanly northsunm at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 25 20:47:18 PDT 2009


Thank you. In the old days the system used to warn you: There is no subject. THe new system gives no warning allows you to make yourself look like an idiot! Thanks for the correction. You are right of course Meggrahi has consistently maintained his innocence.

It does seem to me symptomatic of the uncritical stance of the mainstream western press that they fail to understand that in some areas of the world people may think of Megrahi as innocent and a sacrificial lamb and that there are plausible grounds for their thinking that.

Blog: http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html Blog: http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html

--- On Tue, 8/25/09, Left-Wing Wacko <leftwingwacko at gmail.com> wrote:


> From: Left-Wing Wacko <leftwingwacko at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] (no subject)
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 9:55 PM
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:35 PM, ken
> hanly<northsunm at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> "Megrahi has always denied his innocence and he continues
> to do so
> while he is dying. He was making a second appeal of his
> sentence which
> he dropped and subsequently he was granted this release.
> You won't
> find this even mentioned in mainstream reports. In fact I
> have not
> even seen a recent report about all this that mentions the
> fact he
> might not be guilty! Why?"
>
> You must mean he "has always claimed his innocence....."
>
> And how about a subject line please.
> Thanks,
> Sheldon
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list