[lbo-talk] Howard Dean: 'Kill The Senate Bill'

Michael Pollak mpollak at panix.com
Tue Dec 15 19:28:12 PST 2009


[Interesting footnote: There was no way to pass a public option through the 51-vote reconciliation process, because you can't use it to create a new program, only to expand an existing one. But once the public option was killed and replaced with a medicare buy-in, I think that suddenly makes the reconciliation process a theoretical possibility, because that would be an expansion of an existing program: medicare.]

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/12/15-6

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

The Plum Line

Howard Dean: 'Kill The Senate Bill'

by Greg Sargent

In a blow to the bill grinding through the Senate, Howard Dean

bluntly called for the bill to be killed in a pre-recorded interview

set to air later this afternoon, denouncing it as "the collapse of

health care reform in the United States Senate," the reporter who

conducted the interview tells me.

Dean said the removal of the Medicare buy-in made the bill not worth

supporting, and urged Dem leaders to start over with the process of

reconciliation in the interview, which is set to air at 5:50 PM

today on Vermont Public Radio, political reporter Bob Kinzel

confirms to me.

The gauntlet from Dean -- whose voice on health care is well

respsected among liberals -- will energize those on the left who are

mobilizing against the bill, and make it tougher for liberals to

embrace the emerging proposal. In an excerpt Kinzel gave me, Dean

says:

"This is essentially the collapse of health care reform in the

United States Senate. Honestly the best thing to do right now is

kill the Senate bill, go back to the House, start the

reconciliation process, where you only need 51 votes and it would

be a much simpler bill."

Kinzel added that Dean essentially said that if Democratic leaders

cave into Joe Lieberman right now they'll be left with a bill that's

not worth supporting.

Dean had previously endorsed the Medicare buy-in compromise without

a public option, saying that the key question should be whether the

bill contains enough "real reform" to be worthy of progressives'

support. Dean has apparently concluded that the "real reform" has

been removed at Lieberman's behest -- which won't make it easier for

liberals to swallow the emerging compromise.

© 2009 The Plum Line



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list