> One, besides the pleasure (which I would feel as well as
> anyone) what exactly do we get of kicking out management?
> Wouldn't we simply have to hire new bankers who we would
> then have to get up to speed? Isn't it more a question
> of re-regulating bankers, whoever they are?
Doug Henwood wrote:
> There should be consequences for failure. Future execs
> should know that if they fuck up bigtime, no biscuit for
> them.
If you leave the fuckups in charge, why won't their priority be to cover their asses, even when that isn't a plausible end? Would it be a surprise for them to defend and continue failure to excuse themselves, even if they fail to convince anyone but themselves?
Shane