> A "we" that had reached it would, by definition, "know" it.
Okay, but numerous people(s) have at one time or another believed they "knew" that they had reached it. So there would seem to be a lot of false positives here.
> Such a "we" has yet to come into being. There are good reasons for
> doubting that it ever will. As I've more than once argued, Marx's
> account of how the historical process will work to bring it into being
> is badly flawed.
Fair enough. Sorry I missed this - can you point again to the post(s) where you laid this out? I'd be interested to (re-)read them....
SA