[lbo-talk] Fitch and Brenner

[Charles Brown]

I think I got that. What I was saying is that Fitch's #2 cannot be caused by his #1. Or, put another way, #1 can't cause #2. It's a logical impossibility. #2 can be caused by various things but it can't be caused by #1. And even if it were true that #1 actually happened, it could not have been the cause of #2. 

SA 

^^^^^
CB: How is it a logical impossibility
that money was sent away from "home", and
went somewhere to earn more, because
it is not earning enough at "home" ?