http://webabuser.blogspot.com/
John Gulick wrote:
> WS says:
>
> ...
>
> Since the two perspectives are mostly forms of anti-liberal (in the US sense)
> demagogy, rather than principled worldviews, it's not surprising that they
> can co-exist. Still, at a certain level, "cognitive dissonance" has to be overcome.
> How does this work? I have a proposal.
>
> Right-wing populists rail against against government spending because it
> empowers elitist liberal politicians and bureaucrats, who get to decide how
> to spend "your hard-earned tax dollars" (rather than "you yourself" getting
> to decide). Libertarians focus on how resource allocation by elitist liberal
> politicians and bureaucrats distorts market efficiency and hampers economic
> growth. Paleoconservatives focus on how resource allocation by elitist liberal
> politicians and bureaucrats invariably showers largesse on the morally unworthy
> constituents and clients of said politicians and bureaucrats, like the "shiftless"
> non-white poor (the putative beneficiaries of sub-prime mortgages!) or agents
> of foreign interests bent on "subverting" the US (like the Chinese-Indonesian
> Lippos). But in the market-idolizing and national-narcissist US, the two worldviews
> tend to bleed into another.
>
>
--
Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Incontri con Meetic : Primo sito d'incontri in Europa - Milioni di single !
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=8293&d=20-2