I think the whole "thinkin' is for wimmin'" thing is really new. Like, in the past 2-3 decades. It sure isn't in Conan Doyle with his misogynistic super-sleuth. ;)
--- On Tue, 2/24/09, Philip Pilkington <pilkingtonphil at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I hope my approach wasn't seen as offensive..... it
> seems to put forward the
> connection between abstract thinking and supposed
> femininity.... Important
> connection, if you ask me!
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk