> The mistaken premise behind this argument is that the USSR got rid of
> the commodity. I don't even think Soviet economists would make that
> argument. robert wood
>
Hmm. In the Dictionary of Marxist Thought entry for "Commodity," it says commodities are "products produced for a system of exchange." Was the Soviet economy a system of exchange? In any event, the way I originally phrased the issue, before slipping into a shorthand version, was: "Commodity exchange was abolished (at least as the dominant form of economic activity) in the Soviet Union."
It's true that goods were exchanged, despite the fact that the exchange of goods was frowned upon by official dogma. Why do you think that is?
SA