in many jobs, especially where you have access to anything having to do with money or computer technology or information systems, they run credit checks on you as part of your screening for hire. if you have a bad credit history, you're immediately red-flagged as a potential risk. people who don't pay their bills or have high debt-income ratios are seen as potential thieves.
additionally, i've heard that if you even live with someone -- partner, child, parent -- who has bad credit, it will reflect on you as well.
and me? i have enough going on in my life that i really don't want to be bothered with writing letters, making phone calls, etc. etc. i pay the fucking bill at some ridiculous "reduced" rate and make a note to never, ever let it happen again. e.g., i now have a list of every single credit card, vendor, utility company, the account number, etc. and I'm vigilant about keeping my address records up to date and not letting anything fall through the cracks in the first place.
the obvious answer, as you well know, is that if you want to live in mainstream u.s. society, you hew to these demands. If you don't and are happy living on the margins, spending your time fighting people about bills and payments and how much you owe and going to court and such, then you can do as you please. It's sort of like asking us why we work and then pointing to your own lifestyle as the obvious answer as to how to avoid all these problems we discuss. :)
seems silly to me, bill.
and personally, i spent a lifetime living on the margins of mainstream society or so barely inside it that the threat of falling out of it was always imminent. i have no fucking interest in living like that ever again. i never ever want to wonder where my next dollar will come from, if my car will break down on the next job hunting trip, or where i will sleep that night. and the last thing i ever freakin want to do is live in some anarchist commune wearing a hair shirt or some horse shittery.
nothing's too good for the working class!
shag
At 08:31 PM 2/27/2009, Bill Bartlett wrote:
>Obviously I'm unfamiliar with the US banking system, so I don't quite
>follow how this extortion racket works. I understand it up to the point
>where the bank concocts a large debt which it puts into a collection
>agency. What I don't follow is why you and shag actually pay the extortion
>demand.