>Kenneally comes in at the low end of the Scientific
>American range -- say the Douglas Hofstadter level. If that.
I said once before that Kenneally got people here talking about something for days and that shouldn't be sneezed at. If Shag and Chuck like it those are recommendations I'll always take.
> I thought uou hadn't actually read [Kenneally]?
>It's on Google books as somebody pointed out back when we were
>quarreling about it. I read in it a bit, enough to get the drift:
>charming anecdotes about ravens and porpoises, oversold flackery for
>the great insights of evolutionary psychology, thumbsucking
>speculation about how language might have arisen. Shallow stuff.
You big strong man. You make it sound like a chick flick.