i realized that later; also the 94 was meant to be a 91 in that note.
--- On Tue, 7/14/09, socialismorbarbarism <socialismorbarbarism at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: socialismorbarbarism <socialismorbarbarism at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] More on Kenneally
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 2:34 PM
> mart: "i personally find pinker
> pretty appaling. but he fits well at
> MIT keeping the rock of solidarity of ideology with a
> smooth face"
>
> Pinker is at Harvard now--where maintaining "solidarity of
> ideology
> with a smooth face" is much more of an institutional raison
> d'etre, so
> it is probably a happy fit for all concerned.
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:36 AM, mart<media314159 at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > i think i read the pinker and bloom article(s).
> their main point seemed to be there were actually 2
> language learning systems, which was a way to solve or get
> around the empiricist/innatist debate (like the
> selfish./altruistic debate). it turned out, surprisingly,
> that both systems exist (just as it turned out people
> surprisingly are both selfish and altuistic ...
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>