[lbo-talk] Blue Dogs cashing in

[Carrol Cox]

Matthias Wasser wrote:
> 
> I think part of the confusion might be that Carrol is using "moral" in a
> more specific sense than the rest of us.

No. The confusion  comes from the assumption that these views are
Carrol's _own_; that he is engaging in original thought as it were. On
the contrary, my perspective is entirely unoriginal, and is shared by a
large number of thinkers. I suggest you read Chapter 4 of Ollman's
_Alienation_ and the article by  Tomas that I have several times quoted
from and given the URL for. You are wasting your time and energy trying
to decipher Cox's non-existent idiosycratid  thought.

Repeat: There is _nothing_ original to my thinking on this question, and
to understand it you have to go to my sources, not focus on me.

Carrol