[lbo-talk] Why Public Option Is Defective; Why Only Single-Payer Will Do

M myles.sussman at yahoo.com
Thu Jul 30 14:31:16 PDT 2009


Here is an older paper about administrative costs (which is where I think they think the savings would come from). http://www.pnhp.org/publications/nejmadmin.pdf

not sure what if anything is helpful here: http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single_payer_resources.php

----- Original Message ---- From: Michael Pollak <mpollak at panix.com> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:43:12 AM Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Why Public Option Is Defective; Why Only Single-Payer Will Do


> http://www.progressive.org/mpwool072209.html

<snip>


> Single-payer national health care could realize about $400 billion in
> savings annually -- enough to cover the uninsured and to upgrade
> coverage for all Americans.

Woolhandler and Himmelstein having been quoting figures like this since they founded PNHP.  Does anyone know the location of a paper where these savings are itemized in detail?

Michael ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list