> well, you could look at it this way: the population is currently six and a
> half billion. Without social organisation of production, the human species
> would not have generated the surplus product to sustain more than what, a
> million people, meaning that more than six billion of the spinal cords,
> livers and so on walking the earth, are truly social products, that would
> never have existed by nature alone
No doubt. But who is contesting this point? The conversation has rather gone off the rails (if it was ever on them).
--
Michael Smith mjs at smithbowen.net http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org