> My point is that it's a
> fundamental error to juxapose biological factors and the environment and
> then ask if X is caused by the former or the latter.
Large quantities of arsenic will kill you. Is this environmentally determined? Or determined by some complicated intersection of biological and social factors? In what society has it ever not been true? In what future society might it not be true?
--
Michael Smith mjs at smithbowen.net http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org