James Heartfield wrote:
>
> Julio wrote:
> "that does not exclude that the CIA and the Mossad may be trying to exploit the situation to advance their agendas"
>
> No indeed. Simon Tisdall writes in the Guardian:
> "Iranian officials say US protestations of non-interference would be more credible if the White House publicly cancelled a $400m Bush era covert programme, authorised in 2007, that they say was intended to destabilise Iran, with the ultimate aim of regime change."
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/jun/16/iran-elections
Regardless what the facts are re the election, can anyone seriously suggest that the u.s. is not deeply involved in "diestabalizing" Iran, and using tactcs, in fact , hauntingly similar to those kused by the Eisenhower Administration in overthrowing Mossedegh. People write about u.s. foreign policy as though it has no history, or that history is irrelevant.
CArrol