"Transcendence of the nation-state, Marx believed, would be a task not for capital but for labour. A century later, as the Cold War set in, Kojève held that whichever camp achieved it would emerge the victor from the conflict. The foundation of the European Community settled the issue for him. The West would win, and its triumph would bring history, understood categorically – not chronologically – as the realisation of human freedom, to an end. Kojève’s prediction was accurate. His extrapolation, and its irony, remain in the balance. They have certainly not been disproved: he would have smiled at the image of a chit of plastic. The emergence of the Union may be regarded as the last great world-historical achievement of the bourgeoisie, proof that its creative powers were not exhausted by the fratricide of two world wars, and what has happened to it as a strange declension from what was hoped from it. Yet the long-run outcome of integration remains unforeseeable to all parties. Even without shocks, many a zigzag has marked its path. With them, who knows what further mutations might occur."
--Perry Anderson, "Depicting Europe," LRB 20 September 2007 Full article at <http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n18/ande01_.html>.
Doug Henwood wrote:
> So the EU is refusing a bailout for Eastern Europe, and the ECB is still
> hanging pretty tough. I dunno, Dennis Redmond - the EU isn't really
> looking like it has what it takes to be the next hegemon. It sounds like
> the last bastion of the austere POV that Keynes mocked as "the Treasury
> view."
>
> Doug
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk