[lbo-talk] Juan Cole on Pakistan's political party crisis

Michael Pollak mpollak at panix.com
Tue Mar 10 13:02:40 PDT 2009


http://www.juancole.com/2009/03/pakistan-political-crisis-deepens.html

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Pakistan Political Crisis Deepens

The Pakistani Taliban are not going to take over the Pakistani

government. That worry doesn't keep me up at night. They are small, and

operate in a rugged, remote area of the country. They can set off bombs

and be a destabilizing force. But a few thousand tribesmen can't take

over a country of 165 million with a large urban middle class that has

a highly organized and professional army.

In contrast, the increasingly rancorous conflict between the left of

center, largely secular Pakistan People's Party and the right of

center, big-landlord Muslim League, has the potential to tear the

country apart.

So here is some important background. Pakistan is made up of four

ethnically and linguistically based provinces, Sindh, Baluchistan, the

North-West Frontier, and Punjab. Punjab is Pakistan's most populous

province, with 55 percent of the population and much of the country's

wealth.

The PPP, led by the Bhutto family of Sindh, has a national organization

and won seats from all over the country in the parliamentary election

of Feb. 2008. But its firmest base is Sindh, which is a province

divided into a very poor rural Sindhi population and the big urban port

of Karachi, which is mainly populated by Urdu-speakers whose families

came from India at Partition in 1947. Karachi's politics is now

dominated by the MQM, an Urdu-speakers' secular nationalist party,

which has developed an alliance with the Pakistan People's Party.

Baluchistan only has 5 percent of the country's population, and is

vast, rugged and arid. It may have a lot of natural gas but who knows?

Right now it is not a big player. The North-West Frontier is populated

by Pushtuns, organized as somewhat egalitarian clans. They have been

most deeply affected by the wars in Afghanistan, and a movement of

Pakistani Taliban is active there, though most Pushtuns are not

fundamentalists or militants.

So Punjab is the real prize for a politician, sort of the California of

Pakistani politics, being rich agriculturally but also having a dynamic

urban sector.

In last year's elections, the PPP took Sindh and was able to find

political allies in Baluchistan and the North-West Frontier. But the

Muslim League took Punjab. Shahbaz Sharif, the brother of the Muslim

League's leader, Nawaz Sharif, was the Chief Minister of Punjab.

PPP leader Asaf Ali Zardari initially sought an alliance with the

Muslim League against then dictator Pervez Musharraf, and pledged that

Shahbaz would remain Chief Minister of Punjab even though the PPP

became the dominant party in the federal parliament.

A conflict developed between Nawaz Sharif and PPP leader Asaf Ali

Zardari over the deposed chief justice Iftikhar Chaudhury. Dictator

Musharraf had dismissed Chaudhury in spring of 2007 for opposing some

of his policies. Pakistan's massive legal establishment began holding

rallies and demanding that the chief justice be reinstated, which he

was in summer 2007. Musharraf was under pressure from Washington to

become a civilian president. But he found out that fall that the

supreme court would not allow this transition because the constitution

requires that a military man have been out of the service for 2 years

before becoming president. So Musharraf just dismissed the whole

supreme court, including the recently reinstated Chaudhury, and

appointed a new court, which sycophantically recognized him as

president.

When he was allowed to come back to Pakistan from exile in Saudi

Arabia, Nawaz Sharif, who had been overthrown as prime minister in 1999

by Musharraf, began demanding that Iftikhar Chaudhury and the old,

dismissed, supreme court be reinstated.

After the PPP won the parliamentary elections, its leader, Zardari,

declined to reinstate Chaudhury. Zardari was afraid that the chief

justice might reinstate the corruption charges against him, which had

been amnestied by Musharraf.

Zardari was elected president last September. The conflict between him

and the Muslim League, simmered along.

But just last week, the supreme court dismissed Shahbaz Sharif as chief

minister of Punjab, and barred him and Nawaz Sharif from running for

office. Some suspect the court of acting at President Zardari's behest.

The Sharif brothers say that this court is anyway illegitimate and

refuse to recognize its rulings, since it is the fruit of a poisoned

tree, i.e. the arbitrary creature of a desperate military dictator 18

months ago.

The attorneys are also still angry over the failure of Zardari to

reinstate Chaudhury and the others.

So on March 15, the Muslim League (which is more conservative landlord

than religious fundamentalist, despite the name) is organizing a "long

march" on parliament to protest the current supreme court and the

recent decisions it issued against the Sharifs.

On the hustings, Nawaz Sharif said that the only thing that could save

Pakistan now was a revolution, and announced that he had "raised the

standard of rebellion."

An adviser to the Interior Ministry (equivalent to our Homeland

Security) then came out yesterday and warned that the Sharifs could be

charged with sedition if they talk like that.

So now you have people talking about the danger of a repeat of the

partition of Pakistan into Bangladesh and West Pakistan in 1971. I

presume the Muslim League would get Punjab and the PPP would get the

other three provinces.

For Pakistan's two major civilian parties, who only 7 months ago rid

the country of a military dictator, to go mano a mano at each other

like this is potentially tragic. If they destabilize the country, they

could tempt the military to come back out of the barracks and make yet

another coup. Short of that, there could be faction-fighting in

villages and cities.

Pakistan is a nuclear state, so this degree of instability is

especially worrying. The danger is not a take-over by the Taliban, but

rather a coup (led by whom of what views?) or blood in the streets.

Meanwhile, dictator-in-retirement Musharraf blames the Pakistan Muslim

League (N)-- the "N" stands for Nawaz-- for the crisis.

The Taliban are small potatoes compared to this clash of titans.

posted by Juan Cole @ 3/10/2009 12:58:00 AM



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list