>>was that transcribed from mackris's memory or were there recordings?
>
>The speculation at the time was that she'd recorded the conversations.
>
>Doug
Legally too:
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20041028_spilbor.html
>Mackris's complaint details O'Reilly's alleged soliloquies -
>complete with "ums" and pauses. It seems likely, for this reason,
>that Mackris must have somehow recorded O'Reilly's ramblings. And
>these recordings, if they occurred in New York, may have been
>perfectly legal: New York is a "one party consent" state when it
>comes to recording -- which means that although wiretaps remain
>illegal, one party to a conversation can legally tape the other
>without his knowledge.