The most worrisome thing I've heard is the WH assuring the Right that non-defense discretionary spending (which excludes the big social insurance and anti-poverty programs) will shrink to close to three percent of GDP, starting in four or five years. It's a discouraging signal, though it could turn out to be nothing more than that.
The bottom line is that as far as the BHO non-defense budget goes, pending Congressional disposition of it, the left has nothing to complain about. Zero, except maybe the stimulus is too small. (Though it may be doubted that Congress would have gone for anything bigger, first time around.)
-----Original Message----- From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org] On Behalf Of Doug Henwood Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 11:40 AM To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] liberal austerity
On Mar 26, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Politicus E. wrote:
> Hi. I am reading the CBO report on the Obama adminstration's budget
> proposal, and find myself somewhat puzzled. On the one hand, I
> believe that
> an orthodox austerity program might be on the agenda in future
fiscal
> years. On the other hand, the CBO report does not confirm my view.
> According to their forcasts, which must be taken with more than a
> bit of
> skepticism in light of the failure of many macroeconomic models to
> predict
> this economic crisis, the on-budget deficit will be 14.1% of GDP in
> 2009,
> 10.4% in 2010, 7.3% in 2011, and about 5% by the time of the next
> presidential election.
CBO projections are cautious in the sense that they mostly extrapolate
the present into the future. There's no austerity baked in right now,
but it wouldn't surprise me at all to see it evolve in the coming months. Important agents of austerity could well be the dozen or so Senate Dems who are resisting the leadership's push to make the budget
pass with only 51 votes, and not the full filibuster-proof 60.
Doug ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk