[lbo-talk] umbrellas and hasidism

ravi ravi at platosbeard.org
Tue Mar 31 15:18:11 PDT 2009


On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Dwayne Monroe wrote:
> Ravi wrote:
>
> BTW, I do think of Doss's posts as a Denial of Service attack, often
> appropriate, except when aimed at Carrol! ;-)
>
> ............
>
> Oh, Ravi, you would say that.
>
> Because truly, if CD is the Proconsul of one linemanship, you --
> during your previous tenure onlist -- often acted as at least the
> Praetor.

For a second, I thought you were ranking me below the young and impetuous Doss. Then I realised that in referring to him as proconsul, you were alluding not to Roman hierarchies, but to that common parent of ours and the great apes that trod the earth a few million years ago. Phew! What a relief.


> And I think it's due to what my grandfather called 'smart
> person's disease'. Being clever, and knowing it (please, no false
> modesty)

It's false only if its modesty, not if it’s the truth!


> ... you guys often assume that you don't really need to make your
> way through, for example, the text shag might post about feminist
> theory or civil rights history. You've already got things sorted out;
> all that's needed is a pithy reply that quickly reveals bad logic.
> (Hagiographical exceptions are made for heroes.)
>
> To quote comedian Patton Oswald, you shout *slappity blappity dooo!*
> in reply to a complex argument you don't like or don't actually get,
> then pour yourself a cool, refreshing glass of I-Shure-Showed-Them.

Yikes, my good man! This is not true. I have not been following any of these current threads (I was speaking of the Muscovite youth in general terms), nor have I in previous on-list incarnations, offered one-liners AFAIK in any debates regarding feminist theory or civil rights history. My one-liners are at best (at worst?) usually a surrender... an acceptance of the fact that I have little in way of reasoned argument to offer!

Alarmed at your charges, I quickly scanned the 1543 messages I dumped on this earnest list (that is dating from just the 17th of Sep, 2005, mind you! nevertheless meeting the quota strictures of the majordomos er I mean Mailmans, at least in average). My archives did not yield anything that would corroborate this villainous version of me (but then again, would I notice if they did?), but I did find this gem from Carl (I hope there is no argument that he is/was the Ceaser!):

At around 3/10/05 11:35 am, Carl Remick wrote:
>> From: Michael Hirsch <mmh at pipeline.com>
>>
>> Hitchens (infuriates the hell out of me, but is a commmate pub int.)
>
> If by "commmate pub int" you mean jiveass piece of shit, I would
> have to
> agree with you.

--ravi

-- Support something better than yourself ;-) PeTA => http://peta.org/ Greenpeace => http://greenpeace.org/ If you have nothing better to read: http://platosbeard.org/



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list