On May 5, 2009, at 9:02 PM, Michael Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 5 May 2009 20:24:04 -0400
> Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>> There are some problems with the new
>> WSJ, but it's still a great paper, and if Thomson can keep it alive
>> economically, then the world is better off.
>
> Maybe you & I would be better off. But the world?
> That's a large claim. I'm sure you've thought it
> through, though, and would be happy to hear your
> reasoning.
The world is better off with the more thoughtful provision of information than without it. Why not?
Doug