Jenny Brown wrote:
>
> Michael Pollak wrote:
> >As for higher retirement age, some of that would simply be adjusting
> >accounting to reality, no?
NO! I haven't been following this thread, but the latest retir5ement age should be 63. This is _still_ an incredibly wealthy nation. There is no excuse not to free its population over 60. Liberal fiddling on this is a bit sickening.
Carrol