[lbo-talk] gore vidal is an old, cranky prick

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Mon Nov 2 05:25:31 PST 2009


On Nov 2, 2009, at 12:55 AM, Eric Beck wrote:


> On 10/30/09, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>
>> But it's a cop out always to point to grand
>> forces without at all examining human agency or institutional
>> specificity. Rates of profit matter, but so do historical figures
>> like
>> Ronald Reagan. And surely there are things that a left can learn from
>> history, and can do better if we think things through. Obviously
>> there
>> are forces larger than us, but we're not passive lumps either.
>
> (As an aside, surely you don't think "Ronald Reagan" was reducible to
> the biological organism named Ronald Reagan?)

No, of course not, and I'm almost insulted that you asked the question. But people like Reagan do matter - he was able to bridge gaps on the right between the Christians and the marketeers, win over a corporate elite that was originally skeptical of his agenda, and seduce enough of the electorate to win. He was a very successful spinner of fantasies, and that mattered. In Carrol's world, individuals and even institutions don't seem to matter - it's just the Forces of History working. There's no agency in CoxLand at all.


> Okay, now I think I see the point of disagreement, though maybe it's
> better to say that you and Carrol are talking about two completely
> different things. Though I think Carrol could do better describing his
> take on this stuff, I think he's questioning the exact distinction you
> are insisting on here: that there are individuals who are opposed to,
> autonomous from, and largely against historical forces.

Opposed to or distinct from? Not at all. Really. What kind of idiot do you take me for?

Doug



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list