[lbo-talk] How radical was Derrida? (was 'does anyone read poststructuralism anymore?')

Chris Doss lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 3 01:13:55 PST 2009


If you're going to attack Derrida for being heavily influenced by Heidegger, you're going to have to do the same for Arendt, Marcuse, Sartre, Adorno, Horkheimer, Levinas, Merleau-Ponty, Gadamer, Celan, and practically any thinker post-Heidegger worth anything. There is a reason for that, i.e., Heidegger is the most important philosopher of the 20th century alongside Wittgenstein (more important, in my opinion).

Anyway the whole idea that a thinker's work should be assessed based on "what it means for politics" is bass ackwards. You're in full Trotskyist "burn the heretic" mode here.

----- Original Message ---- From: James Heartfield <Heartfield at blueyonder.co.uk> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Sent: Tue, November 3, 2009 11:16:01 AM Subject: [lbo-talk] How radical was Derrida? (was 'does anyone read poststructuralism anymore?')

The intellectual milieu Derrida moved in at the Ecole Normale Superieur and as a contributor to the journal Tel Quel, was heavily influenced by an increasingly radical outlook, that moved from official Communism to posturing Maoism. Politically, though, Derrida's instincts were more much conservative.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list