[lbo-talk] How radical was Derrida? (was 'does anyone read poststructuralism anymore?')

C. G. Estabrook galliher at illinois.edu
Sun Nov 8 12:16:58 PST 2009


Actually, I'm siting in the midst of a convention of psychoanalysts at the moment, so you may have a point.

"A lot of things one is ready to believe3 because they are uncanny [unheimlich]." --Wittgenstein

---- Original/ message ----
>Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 05:13:47 -0500
>From: Joseph Catron <jncatron at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] How radical was Derrida? (was 'does anyone read poststructuralism anymore?')
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>
>On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 6:15 PM, C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu> wrote:
>
>> But x is universally wrong, and there are no (effectual) witches.
>
>So your claim is that the stupid unwashed masses have brought the
>witch doctors their money for centuries, but not a single one of them
>has ever gotten anything of value in return? By what strange logic
>would such a thing be possible?
>
>--
>"Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure
>mægen lytlað."
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list