[lbo-talk] How radical was Derrida? (was 'does anyone read poststructuralism anymore?')

[Ted Winslow]

Chris Doss wrote:


> Anyway, my whole point was that the following arguments are invalid  
> and therefore false.
>

This "whole point" ignores that the grounds for any ontological claim  
have to be "phenomenological" (in the sense of Husserl); they can't be  
"logical".

So here your mistaking a phenomenological argument for a logical one.

Ted