[lbo-talk] more on why movies suck

[Catherine Driscoll]

Plenty of weird, arty, non-blowing up things get made, even if they're not on this list. And Hitchcock loved studio dollars and was not hostile to special effects as he had them at the time. I think Hitch would definitely have got things made now... and he probably would have occasionally blown stuff up. At least somewhere along the terror/horror continuum of threatening the audience with things blowing up.

C

-----Original Message-----
From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org on behalf of Doug Henwood
Sent: Wed 18/11/2009 09:02
To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] more on why movies suck

 

On Nov 17, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Catherine Driscoll wrote:


> What makes you think Hitchcock wouldn't get a movie made today?

Too weird, too arty, nothing blowing up.
___________________________________
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk