Fixing this problem requires not more "popular appeal" - which why the problem is there in the first place - but moving away from it, i.e. by some progressive authority i.e. a "vanguard party" legislating it from above.
Wojtek
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Eric Beck wrote:
>
> The Neoliberalization Of Higher Education: What’s Race Got To Do With It?
>>
>
> Well I don't know. What does it have to do with it?
>
> California is totally broke, in a class by itself among all U.S. states,
> really, so there is a serious fiscal problem which this unnamed writer
> doesn't want to admit to. Why is it at all surprising that the bourgeois
> solution to it would be to cut aid to those most needing it? This piece
> asserts, but doesn't even try to prove, that race is a driving factor in
> this approach. Yes, there's no doubt that people of color are
> disproportionately hurt by austerity, but where's the evidence that
> ethnicity is what it's about? There are plenty of poor white people who are
> going to be hit by this too. What political purpose is served by
> foregrounding the racial angle? Why not pitch it in some more universal way
> that might win broader support?
>
> Doug
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>