>I didn't interpret it that way. Growing more ethnically diverse,
>doesn't mean you started from no ethnic diversity at all.
What I mean is it oversimplifies a more complicated story.
>The numbers cited in the article describe a 3-5% dip in the black
>population in two different places. That doesn't mean blacks have
>disappeared and do not contribute to the "diversity" of california.
Again, my point is it's too simple a take. I don't see how collapsing info into a stew to back up an assertion, not an argument, helps anything.