Ok. so you don't think structures are real? What about the structural racism/sexism (you even place class in structural terms sometimes) you go on about? This was actually my point before that you did not understand. Is it just that you don't like it when people talk about class as a structure as opposed to other 'identities' or 'subjectivities'? Then you use gender stereotypes, or identity, to disarm most people (not me ;)) by showing how it can hurt too. Anyway, you made me laugh and I guess that is something.
Brad
>
> heh. the manly man might have to do with the two "non" manly man
> occupations you say should be part of any prols movement?
>
> but no, that isn't the "manly man" politics I'm necessarily talking about.
> well, wait yeah. i guess it is: i don't think "ideology" is "merely"
> removed. i don't think that it can be whisked away in a way that the
> "structurally defined relationship of exploitation" cannot be.
>
> big he-man must do hard dirty work of smashing strucutres. structures like
> big big building. smash structures. smash smash. smash big building. look
> at culture? see ideology disintegrate into mere dust. smash smash. *chest
> pounding* *tarzan yell*
>
>
> shag
>
>
>