[lbo-talk] more noxious crap

[shag carpet bomb]

At 01:24 PM 10/3/2009, shag carpet bomb wrote:
>when you get a chance, you should revisit my post and respond with some 
>respect. thanks. you are responding like a child. the comment about Marx's 
>letter to Arnold Ruge makes utterly no sense, since he wasn't talking 
>about making revolution but writing a fucking journal.

i should clarify: "*violent* revolution" wasn't his subject in the letter, 
it was a discussion about the practical politics of producing a journal and 
getting involved in politics. as such, revolution was surely the implicit 
subject of the letter.

shag