>I believe that Reed/Michaels/Zizek are addressing an element of the
>current scene which, moving with sinister majesty, gains greater and
>greater strength,
I think so too. But I think Zizek and Reed do it way better. So why is that?
I also haven't read or heard anything that I think makes Michaels deserving of the prick and asshole jibes he's been getting here. So why is that happening?
I think these may be related questions but I don't have time for more than that just now.