>
> Finally, it argued that the shift in emphasis within the economy and in
> social theory from "concrete" economic and political phenomena to matters
> of
> language and communication was not a symptom of the declining importance of
> the economy, but of an historical change in the mode of production!
>
> H&N were primarily arguing that it really is a post-Fordist (I can't stand
that term) world we live in? The economy's actually shifted to emphasizing
language and communication? That interpretation makes it worse than the one
I couldn't take.
Cranky still,
-A