On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Alan Rudy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Alan Rudy wrote:
>>
>> I'm sure, without the interview, most all of us would have ignored
>>> Michaels.
>>>
>>
>> But with the interview, he was worth, what, 20,000 words? Pretty
>> hefty for
>> someone so allegedly insignificant.
>>
>>
> Nice. Pithy. Snide. Out of context. Doesn't honestly engage the
> point.
> Doesn't actually make an argument. I can take a hint. Later.
No hint, really. I'm not telling you to stop. I don't feel like carrying this on anymore, but that doesn't mean everyone else should shut up.