>
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Alan Rudy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Alan Rudy wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm sure, without the interview, most all of us would have ignored
>>>
>>>> Michaels.
>>>>
>>>> But with the interview, he was worth, what, 20,000 words? Pretty hefty
>>> for
>>> someone so allegedly insignificant.
>>>
>>> Nice. Pithy. Snide. Out of context. Doesn't honestly engage the point.
>> Doesn't actually make an argument. I can take a hint. Later.
>>
>
> No hint, really. I'm not telling you to stop. I don't feel like carrying
> this on anymore, but that doesn't mean everyone else should shut up.
Nope, no point, hoped to be taken seriously, got nowhere, had more than enough, done.