[lbo-talk] corporate rationality

[shag carpet bomb]

At 11:53 AM 10/12/2009, brad bauerly wrote:
>I don't know but it seems to me that WBM and shag have effectively the 
>same underlying argument but just come to different conclusions.  Shag is 
>arguing that because capitalism needs to claim equality while being based 
>in inequality it constructs racism to divide us on some other basis 
>besides class.  From this she draws the conclusion that we must first get 
>rid of racism in order to show the 'true' class based inequality of the 
>system.

bzzzt. wrongo. hint: racialization is not the same as racism conventionally 
understood. that is why I talked about the racialization of poor _whites_.

shag