>On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:46 AM, shag carpet bomb wrote:
>
>>At 03:56 PM 10/13/2009, Doug Henwood wrote:
>>>No one, least of all me, is arguing that x isn't lived
>>>through y or vice versa,
>>
>>
>>I can't parse this sentence. What does it mean?
>
>Race lived through gender, gender through class, etc. etc. It's hardly
>an original formulation.
Ok. but I need an illustration because I don't understand what _you_ mean by it.
BTW, you'll be happy to know that Anderson's Free landed on the library shelf, so I have another book to eviscerate soon. :)
shag